Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Letter from an Unknown Woman and the Melancholia of Philosophy: Cavell, Austin, Derrida / Jukić, Tatjana.

By: Jukić, Tatjana.
Material type: ArticleArticleDescription: 203-220 str.ISSN: 0039-3339.Other title: LETTER FROM AN UNKNOWN WOMAN AND THE MELANCHOLIA OF PHILOSOPHY: CAVELL, AUSTIN, DERRIDA [Naslov na engleskom:].Subject(s): 6.03 | melankolija, melodrama, glas, obećanje, film, filozofija, psihoanaliza hrv | melancholia, melodrama, voice, promise, film, philosophy, psychoanalysis engOnline resources: Click here to access online In: Studia Romanica et Anglica Zagrabiensia 54 (2009), str. 203-220Summary: My text analyzes the agency of melancholia and melodrama in the philosophy of Stanley Cavell, where they labor as a sinthome of what in philosophy is memory. This analysis hinges on a close reading of Stefan Zweig's Letter from an Unknown Woman as a point of access to articulating these concerns, as Cavell's own writing on the subject (in Contesting Tears) hinges on a close reading of Max Ophüls's film based on Zweig's novella, but only after Cavell has explicitly excluded Zweig from his argument. Moving from this exclusion to Cavell's philosophizing of birthplace via Austin and Derrida (in Philosophical Passages), I propose a deconstruction of that position in inheriting and remembering philosophy today, even where it invokes the problem of technics, which still depends on an identitarian politics.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
No physical items for this record

My text analyzes the agency of melancholia and melodrama in the philosophy of Stanley Cavell, where they labor as a sinthome of what in philosophy is memory. This analysis hinges on a close reading of Stefan Zweig's Letter from an Unknown Woman as a point of access to articulating these concerns, as Cavell's own writing on the subject (in Contesting Tears) hinges on a close reading of Max Ophüls's film based on Zweig's novella, but only after Cavell has explicitly excluded Zweig from his argument. Moving from this exclusion to Cavell's philosophizing of birthplace via Austin and Derrida (in Philosophical Passages), I propose a deconstruction of that position in inheriting and remembering philosophy today, even where it invokes the problem of technics, which still depends on an identitarian politics.

Projekt MZOS 130-0000000-0624

Projekt MZOS 130-1301070-1064

ENG

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha

//